In re H.M.

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 989

Syllabus

Because the record establishes that the children had been in the custody of GCCS for over twelve consecutive months when GCCS filed its motion for permanent custody, we find that the juvenile court did not err in finding that R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d) was satisfied. The record further establishes that there is clear and convincing evidence which supports the juvenile court's decision finding that the statutory elements for termination under R.C. 2151.414(B) have been satisfied. Thus, the juvenile court did not err when it awarded permanent custody of the children to GCCS. Judgment affirmed.