In Re Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• § 110 in essence precludes allowance of compensation greater than $200 even 4 based on superior credentials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• United States v. Hinkson
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 2,227×
• Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 1,419×
• British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-11-08· cited 515×
• In the Matter Of: Peter Francis Geraci
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-03-09· cited 105×
• In Re Filiae Eliapo in Re Judy Eliapo, Debtors, Law Offices of David A. Boone v. Devin Derham-Burk U.S. Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-11-13· cited 86×
• In Re Guttierez
  W.D. Texas· 2000-04-17· cited 50×
• Lang v. Lang (In Re Lang)
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-05-28· cited 42×
• Ralph Kermit Winterrowd, 2nd v. Brad L. Nelson John Cyr Jorge Santiago v. Leviticus Washington Michael E. Burkmire Del Smith Dennis Casanovas
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-30· cited 40×
• Hastings v. United States Trustee (In Re Agyekum)
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-10-06· cited 37×
• In Re Farness
  D. Idaho· 2000-01-07· cited 34×
• In Re Doser
  D. Idaho· 2002-07-24· cited 26×
• In Re Kevin J. Doser in Re Laura E. Doser, Judith M. Scott v. United States Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-17· cited 25×
• In Re Bush
  D. Idaho· 2002-03-15· cited 24×
• In Re Bankruptcy Petition Preparers
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-02-23· cited 23×
• Sicherman v. Cohara (In Re Cohara)
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-04-05· cited 18×
• Scott v. United States (In Re Doser)
  D. Idaho· 2003-03-31· cited 16×
• In Re Kassa
  D. Arizona· 1996-07-24· cited 9×
• In the Matter of Kimberly A. Agnew, Debtors. Appeal of Peter Francis Geraci
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-06-03· cited 3×