In Re Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dicta that the “expected result” of vacating order should be to vacate all its effects and reinstatement was effective as of date when order was signed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Geberegeorgis v. Gammarino (In Re Geberegeorgis)
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-05-24· cited 43×
• Sewell v. MGF Funding, Inc. (In Re Sewell)
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-21· cited 27×
• Singleton v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Singleton)
  D. South Carolina· 2006-10-27· cited 15×
• In Re Searcy
  W.D. Arkansas· 2004-08-23· cited 9×
• In re Murphy
  D. Colorado· 2013-06-07· cited 9×
• Gargani v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Gargani)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-01-05· cited 6×
• In Re Aztec Supply Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-01-09· cited 4×
• In Re Garcia
  D. New Mexico· 2010-08-13· cited 4×
• Holloway v. Valley Auto Sales (In re Holloway)
  M.D. Alabama· 2017-01-17· cited 4×
• In Re Jackson
  D. Kansas· 2011-07-18· cited 1×
• Ball v. United Cumberland Bank (In re Ball)
  E.D. Kentucky· 2017-07-17· cited 1×
• In Re: Geberegeorgis v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-05-24
• Coastwide Services, LLC v. Goldberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-02