In Re Highland Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accordingly, J.C. Penney’s claim would be a prepetition claim, if allowed, and therefore, it would not rise to an administrative expense status.”
• noting “[t]he majority of courts ... have held that a right to payment arises at the time of the Debtor’s prepetition misconduct as opposed to the manifestation of the injury itself.”
• ‘Where an indemnification agreement is entered into prior to a bankruptcy filing, such an execution gives the indemnitee a contingent prepetition claim”
• “Where an indemnification agreement is entered into prior to a bankruptcy filing, such an execution gives the indemnitee a contingent prepetition claim .... [t]his is so even where the conduct giving rise to indemnification occurs postpetition”
• “[w]here an indemnification agreement is entered into prior to a bankruptcy filing, such an execution gives the indemnitee a contingent pre-petition claim. This is so even where the conduct giving rise to the indemnification occurs post-petition.”
• “Where an indemnification agreement is entered into prior to a bankruptcy filing, such an execution gives the indemnitee a contingent prepetition claim. This is so even where the conduct giving rise to indemnification occurs postpetition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).