Skip to main content
· 6/19/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 216 F.3d 621
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing defendant’s general “purpose” and “motive” without a hierarchy of motivation
  • “Section 2511 exempts the conversations covered by it from the entirety of Title III. ‘Since . . . the interception in the case was not obtained in violation of the Act, its subsequent use and disclosure was not a violation of the Act.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.