In Re H.F. Radandt, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the time of payment” should not be the focus of Section 507; “[r]ather, the focus should be upon the time the individual performed the service ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency v. Gouveia (In Re Globe Building Materials, Inc.)
  N.D. Indiana· 2006-07-21· cited 4×
• In Re Idearc Inc.
  N.D. Texas· 2010-12-14· cited 4×
• Guterl Special Steel Corp. v. Economic Development Administration (In Re Guterl Special Steel Corp.)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-07-01· cited 3×
• In re Howard
  S.D. Mississippi· 2015-07-23· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-24· cited 763×
• In Re Wall Tube & Metal Products Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1987-10-14· cited 78×
• In Re N.P. Mining Company, Inc., Debtor. Alabama Surface Mining Commission v. N.P. Mining Company, Inc., C. Michael Stilson, Trustee
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-06-23· cited 69×
• In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2005-05-20· cited 48×
• In The Matter Of Quanta Resources Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1984-08-16· cited 44×
• In Re Franklin Signal Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 1986-09-29· cited 23×
• In Re Bill's Coal Co., Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1991-02-06· cited 14×
• In Re Microfab, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1989-08-18· cited 14×
• In Re Better-Brite Plating, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1989-09-22· cited 11×
• In Re Shore Co., Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 1991-10-23· cited 4×
• In Re Better Brite Plating, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1990-10-15· cited 4×