Customs and Patent Appeals· 4/3/1950
In re Heritage
Citations
- 37 C.C.P.A. 1109
- 182 F.2d 639
- 86 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 160
- 1950 CCPA LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There can be no question but that in a patent application, the disclosure thereof may be supplemented by reference to ... any ... disclosure which is available to the public.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell, Garrett, Jackson, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Atmel Corporation v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-12-28· cited 185×
- Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-05-11· cited 40×
- In re HOWARTHCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-07-16· cited 19×
- General Electric Company v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsD.C. Circuit· 1968-10-25· cited 14×
- Clinical Products Limited v. BrennerDistrict of Columbia· 1966-05-02· cited 6×
- Rolls-Royce Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-12-11· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.