Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a credit agreement is not categorically disqualified from being a contemporaneous exchange for new value
• noting that payments made prior to the shipment of goods “were advance payments and therefore, by definition, not recoverable under § 547 as payments for or on account of an antecedent debt”
• “We also review the [bankruptcy court’s] denial of UFP’s motion seeking an evidentiary inference based on spoliation of evidence for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).