Skip to main content
· 6/13/2022

In re H.E.C.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1989

Syllabus

The juvenile court erred by ordering appellant to pay appellee monthly child support for appellant's children for the time they had been in appellee's temporary custody where appellee, although previously the custodian with whom the children resided, were no longer residing with appellee at the time appellee moved the juvenile court for an order of child support. The plain language of R.C. 2151.231 permits only the custodian of a child with whom a child then resides to bring an action in a juvenile court for an order requiring a parent of the child to pay an amount for the support of the child, not the custodian of a child with whom a child had previously resided.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.