In Re Hawkins Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Despite the rationale of In re Esbon Grain Co., Inc., 55 B.R. 308 (Bankr.D.Kansas, 1985), there are no substantial substantive provisions contained in 11 U.S.C. § 557, aside from facilitating the conclusion the grain must be considered as property of the estate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Hawkins
  D. Idaho· 1992-08-14· cited 3×
• In Re Childress
  W.D. Missouri· 1995-05-25· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Butner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
• Torix v. Allred
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 20×
• Farmers Rice Milling Co. v. Hawkins (In Re Bearhouse, Inc.)
  W.D. Arkansas· 1988-01-22· cited 9×
• Jensen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1956-06-27· cited 8×
• In Re Esbon Grain Co., Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1985-11-27· cited 8×
• Midland Bean Company v. Farmers State Bank
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-05-06· cited 7×
• First Nat. Bank of Smith Center, Kan. v. Nugent
  D. Kansas· 1987-04-21· cited 6×