In Re Hatfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the greater the degree of change in obligation ..., the more likely a novation will be found”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re G.S.F. CORPORATION, Debtor, Chase Commercial Corporation, Appellant
  First Circuit· 1991-07-23· cited 267×
• Sheridan v. Michels (In Re Sheridan)
  First Circuit· 2004-03-29· cited 26×
• Marshall v. Security State Bank of Hamilton (In Re Marshall)
  C.D. Illinois· 1990-12-06· cited 10×
• Matter of Hillard
  N.D. Alabama· 1996-07-24· cited 2×
• Sheridan v. Michels
  First Circuit· 2004-03-30· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mulcahy v. Indianapolis Morris Plan Corp. (In Re Mulcahy)
  S.D. Indiana· 1980-03-28· cited 37×
• Edmondson v. Allen-Russell Ford, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-07-28· cited 32×
• Johnson v. Richardson (In Re Richardson)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1985-02-14· cited 17×
• Gillie v. First State Bank of Morton (In Re Gillie)
  N.D. Texas· 1989-02-17· cited 10×
• Underwood v. American Home Mortgage Corp. (In Re Underwood)
  W.D. Virginia· 1986-11-04· cited 9×
• Gayhart v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Illinois (In Re Gayhart)
  N.D. Illinois· 1983-10-07· cited 8×
• General Finance Corp. v. Dingledine (In re Dingledine)
  C.D. Illinois· 1989-05-31· cited 2×