Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge properly used Rule 60(a) to amend a judgment, which was silent as to whether dismissal was with prejudice, to indicate that dismissal was without prejudice
• affirming use of Civil Rule 60(a) to clarify that prior dismissal of cross-complaint was meant to be a dismissal without prejudice based on court’s evident intent
• looking to the circumstances surrounding the original judgment to determine the judge’s original intent
• Civil 23 Rule 60(a) used to amend a prior dismissal order where the 24 record and the recollection of the judge who entered the order 25 indicated that the dismissal was intended to be without 26 27 6 In denying the motion, the court referenced Civil 28 Rule 60(b), not 60(a
• Civil 23 Rule 60(a) used to amend a prior dismissal order where the 24 record and the recollection of the judge who entered the order 25 indicated that the dismissal was intended to be without 26 27 6 In denying the motion, the court referenced Civil 28 Rule 60(b), not 60(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).