In Re Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that loan payment terms can be modified, but “such modification shall have no post-bankruptcy affect and any remaining amount due under the terms of the Contract shall be due pursuant to state contract law at the conclusion of the Modified Plan”
• finding that Till rate applied during pendency of chapter 13 because no part of § 1325(a) prohibits a debtor from employing § 1322(b)(2) to modify the rights of a 910-car creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bank of the Prairie v. Picht (In Re Picht)
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 19×
• In re Crawford
  D. South Carolina· 2015-06-08· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Till v. SCS Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 381×
• In Re Johnson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-02-02· cited 51×
• In Re Lilly
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-10-30· cited 32×
• In Re Trejos
  D. Nevada· 2006-09-25· cited 28×
• In Re Hopkins
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-07-10· cited 10×
• In Re Williams
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-04-23· cited 6×
• In Re Place
  E.D. Arkansas· 1994-10-18· cited 5×
• Holway v. United States (In Re Holway)
  M.D. Florida· 1999-08-06· cited 4×