Skip to main content
· 7/22/1991

In Re Harolyn Anderson, Debtor. Richard M. Anderson, Cross-Appellee v. Harolyn Anderson, Cross-Appellant, and John F. Bufe, Trustee

Citations

  • 936 F.2d 199
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15605
  • 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1500
  • 1991 WL 117755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying standard in context of fee award to attorney for chapter 11 debtor
  • \The bankruptcy court is in the best position to judge the credibility of any witness who testifies under oath before it....\
  • “[T]he bankruptcy court is one of equity and thus has broad equitable — and hence discretionary — powers to award attorney’s fees.”
  • “It is well established law that, absent compliance with the Bankruptcy Code and Rules, an attorney has no absolute right to an award of compensation.”
  • “[T]he bankruptcy court is one of equity and thus has broad equitable—and hence discretionary—powers to award attorney’s fees.”
  • “It is well established law that, absent compliance with the Bankruptcy Code and Rules, an attorney has no absolute right to an award of compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Jolly, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.