In re Harnisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• containing an Appendix describing Patent Office practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Abbott Laboratories and Central Glass Company, Ltd. v. Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. And Baxter Health Care Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-07-03· cited 52×
• Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-08-04· cited 42×
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. Pharmachemie B.V.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-04-21· cited 14×
• Lexington Luminance LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 2014-03-18· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van Venrooy
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-03-12· cited 62×
• In Re Hass
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1944-02-07· cited 33×
• Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. Foster
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-05-21· cited 22×
• In re Haas
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-11-01· cited 14×
• Application of Schechter
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1953-06-03· cited 13×
• In re Weber
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 9×
• In re Thompson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1946-03-06· cited 6×
• In re Swenson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1942-12-01· cited 5×
• In re Haas
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 5×
• In Re Jones
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1947-06-17· cited 4×
• In re Ruzicka
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1945-06-22· cited 4×
• In re Kingston
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1945-04-09· cited 3×
• In re Archbold
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1945-06-22· cited 2×
• In re Winnek
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1947-03-25· cited 1×
• In re May
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1949-02-01· cited 1×