Skip to main content
· 5/17/1957

In re Harnik

Citations

  • 151 F. Supp. 504
  • 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming the mistake in name was well founded, no benefit would accrue and no harm would come to the complaining party, for “this court would merely direct the substitution of” the correct party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.