· 5/17/1957
In re Harnik
Citations
- 151 F. Supp. 504
- 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming the mistake in name was well founded, no benefit would accrue and no harm would come to the complaining party, for “this court would merely direct the substitution of” the correct party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.