In Re Harding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a detective in the Bureau of Investigations in the Pennsylvania Auditor’s General’s office satisfied the work requirements of the Act even though he was not employed in a law enforcement function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Kuma K-9 Security, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-19· cited 12×
• In re Sentry Security, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 5×
• In re Sentry Security, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-20· cited 4×
• In re McMillan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-16· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wiegand v. Wiegand
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 274×
• Schulman v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-07-01· cited 14×
• Norwood v. Ward
  S.D. New York· 1930-12-02· cited 13×