In Re Hall
Citations
- 167 U.S. 38
- 17 S. Ct. 723
- 42 L. Ed. 69
- 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2076
Syllabus
<p>A judgment in the Court of Claims against the District of Columbia recovered under the act of February 13, 1895, c. 87, was-reversed in.this court because interest on the original claim had been improperly allowed, and the case was remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court. The mandate of this court was filed in that court, and application was made for judgment in accordance with the opinion of this court, waiving interest. Pending the decision upon this application, the said act of February 13, 1895, authorizing the original judgment was repealed by Congress, and the Court of Claims declined to enter judgment as prayed for. The plaintiff thereupon made application to this court for a mandamus, to require the Court of Claims to enter judgment as requested. Held, that the effect of the repealing act was to take away the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims to proceed further in any case founded upon the repealed act; but that this court did not intimate by this decision that that court would not have jurisdiction to entertain and grant a motion on the part of the petitioner to reinstate the original judgment.</p>
Judges: Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 689×
- Murphy v. UtterSupreme Court· 1902-05-19· cited 31×
- United States v. McCroryFifth Circuit· 1899-01-03· cited 31×
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.D. Maryland· 1947-10-14· cited 30×
- District of Columbia v. EslinSupreme Court· 1901-11-04· cited 21×
- Burfeind v. Eagle-Picher Co. of TexasN.D. Texas· 1947-05-21· cited 20×
- Petrovich Boscio v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1956-04-30· cited 17×
- Story v. Todd Houston Shipbuilding CorporationS.D. Texas· 1947-07-17· cited 16×
- Industrial Commission v. AgeeUtah Supreme Court· 1920-04-09· cited 12×
- Jones v. American Window Cleaning CorporationE.D. Virginia· 1962-09-07· cited 11×
- Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co.D. Montana· 1947-12-19· cited 10×
- United States v. KellyNinth Circuit· 1899-10-03· cited 9×
- Fairchild v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1899-01-18· cited 8×
- United States v. HawthorneN.D. Texas· 1940-03-11· cited 7×
- Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PlassNinth Circuit· 1932-03-21· cited 7×
- Fuentes v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1958-03-10· cited 7×
- Emblen v. Lincoln Land Co.Eighth Circuit· 1900-04-16· cited 5×
- Miller v. Howe Sound Min. Co.E.D. Washington· 1948-05-11· cited 4×
- Republic Underwriters v. FordFifth Circuit· 1938-12-14· cited 3×
- Emblen v. Lincoln Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska· 1899-06-23· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court· 1879-04-14· cited 146×
- Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court· 1893-03-20· cited 107×
- Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1867-02-18· cited 104×
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1897-02-01· cited 45×
- District of Columbia v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.