In re Haitbrink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court’s exclusion of ‘‘identity-related’’ evidence violated defendant’s right to present defense ‘‘because [his] defense was his innocence,’’ and, therefore, excluded evidence ‘‘was critical to his defense’’
• “‘A trial court’s evidentiary rulings, as well as its application of the Rules of Evidence, are subject to review under an abuse of discretion standard.’ Syl. Pt. 4, State v. Rodoussakis, 204 W. Va. 58, 511 S.E.2d 469 (1998).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).