Skip to main content
· 6/29/1956

In re Haines Lumber & Millwork Co.

Citations

  • 144 F. Supp. 108
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As a matter of relevancy . . . prevailing caselaw supports the propriety of Ms. Snyder’s question seeking Plaintiff’s social security number.” (collecting cases)
  • “As a matter of relevancy . . . prevailing caselaw supports the propriety of Ms. Snyder’s question seeking Plaintiff’s social security number.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.