· 6/29/1956
In re Haines Lumber & Millwork Co.
Citations
- 144 F. Supp. 108
- 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As a matter of relevancy . . . prevailing caselaw supports the propriety of Ms. Snyder’s question seeking Plaintiff’s social security number.” (collecting cases)
- “As a matter of relevancy . . . prevailing caselaw supports the propriety of Ms. Snyder’s question seeking Plaintiff’s social security number.” (collecting cases)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirkpatrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.