In Re Hager

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 13.08% of residence used for business purpose not exempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Prestegaard
  S.D. New York· 1992-04-22· cited 23×
• In Re Miller
  N.D. New York· 1989-05-31· cited 15×
• In Re Vizentinis
  E.D. New York· 1994-12-23· cited 11×
• In Re Citrone
  S.D. New York· 1993-10-14· cited 10×
• In Re Brizida
  D. Massachusetts· 2002-04-24· cited 9×
• In Re Serapiglia
  E.D. New York· 1990-12-24· cited 6×
• In Re Flatt
  N.D. New York· 1993-03-05· cited 6×
• In Re Ford
  N.D. New York· 2009-04-20· cited 3×
• In Re Springmann
  District of Columbia· 2005-08-01· cited 3×
• In Re Rupp
  W.D. New York· 2008-09-26· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arnold Graphics Industries, Inc. v. Independent Agent Center, Inc., and Electronic Tabulating Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1985-10-04· cited 68×
• Pereira v. Checkmate Communications Co. (In Re Checkmate Stereo & Electronics, Ltd.)
  E.D. New York· 1982-06-15· cited 63×
• Albero v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 1986-11-20· cited 19×
• Perrotta v. Irizarry
  S.D. New York· 1977-05-03· cited 19×
• In Re Bartoszewski
  N.D. New York· 1984-02-02· cited 12×
• Raine v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. (In Re Allied Artists Pictures Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 1987-03-04· cited 9×
• In Re Hager
  N.D. New York· 1986-06-30· cited 2×