N.D. Iowa· 2/17/1989
In Re Hageman
Citations
- 108 B.R. 1016
- 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2321
- 1989 WL 160170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding 11 U.S.C. § 1322(a)(2) does not entitle unsecured priority claim holders to interest on their claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael J. Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- In Re RidgleyD. Oregon· 1987-12-04· cited 29×
- In the Matter of Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of United States of AmericaSeventh Circuit· 1983-11-30· cited 21×
- In Re ReichD. Colorado· 1986-10-28· cited 21×
- Still v. Tennessee, Department of Revenue (In Re Rogers)E.D. Tennessee· 1986-01-21· cited 16×
- In Re Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1982-01-19· cited 12×
- Matter of HerrS.D. Iowa· 1987-11-25· cited 12×
- In Re KingsleyD. Connecticut· 1988-05-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.