Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/14/2020
In re H.A.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2945
Syllabus
Permanent custody best interest manifest weight legal custody R.C. 2151.414. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting permanent custody of the minor child to plaintiff-appellee. The trial court's judgment that permanent custody is in the child's best interest is supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 237×
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 216×
- In re C.R.Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 198×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re J.F.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-11· cited 48×
- In re S.C.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-06-28· cited 35×
- In re T.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 29×
- In re T.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-15· cited 27×
- In re A.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-05· cited 14×
- In re K.Z.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-28· cited 10×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-03· cited 8×
- In re S.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.