Second Circuit· 12/14/1925
In Re H. Magen Co.
Citations
- 10 F.2d 91
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The doctrine of ‘pendent venue’ is now well established …. It 11 would seem that there is no practical reason for limiting the application of pendent venue to cases 12 where pendent jurisdiction has also been applied.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Hough, Man-Ton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- Bayless v. Crabtree Through AdamsW.D. Oklahoma· 1989-12-04· cited 33×
- In Re Pinsky-Lapin & Co.Second Circuit· 1938-08-01· cited 23×
- In Re M. & M. Mfg. Co.Second Circuit· 1934-06-04· cited 19×
- Danish v. SofranskiSecond Circuit· 1937-12-13· cited 18×
- Seligson v. GoldsmithSecond Circuit· 1942-06-26· cited 17×
- Goldman v. SilvermanFirst Circuit· 1932-12-17· cited 13×
- Sheinman v. ChalmersThird Circuit· 1929-06-25· cited 11×
- Clark v. MilensNinth Circuit· 1928-10-08· cited 11×
- In re Steinreich Associates, Inc.Second Circuit· 1936-04-20· cited 9×
- Harbaugh v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 1931-12-14· cited 8×
- Schiff v. AranoffSecond Circuit· 1944-12-05· cited 8×
- In re Plaza Shoe Co.Second Circuit· 1926-11-01· cited 6×
- Hirsch v. SchillingThird Circuit· 1928-09-20· cited 6×
- In re GlassbergS.D. New York· 1932-05-16· cited 2×
- Males v. PinskySecond Circuit· 1938-08-01· cited 1×
- In re McMordieN.D. Texas· 1940-07-11· cited 1×
- In re HarnikW.D. Arkansas· 1957-05-17
- In re David Eisner & Co.S.D. New York· 1938-03-15
- In re Mur-Mo Dress, Inc.S.D. New York· 1938-06-24
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re StavrahnSecond Circuit· 1909-11-09· cited 29×
- United States ex rel. Paleais v. MooreSecond Circuit· 1923-11-12· cited 27×
- In re HoldenSixth Circuit· 1913-03-04· cited 26×
- In re SchlesingerSecond Circuit· 1900-05-28· cited 24×
- In re D. Levy & Co.Second Circuit· 1905-11-22· cited 19×
- In re Weber Co.Second Circuit· 1912-11-11· cited 19×
- In Re RedbordSecond Circuit· 1924-11-10· cited 15×
- In re HaringW.D. Michigan· 1912-01-08· cited 11×
- In re ChavkinSecond Circuit· 1918-01-16· cited 11×
Other cases named In Re H. Magen Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.