in Re H M McClinton Minor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in dicta, court’s authority under Rule 59(d) to grant new trial in civil cases for reasons not stated in a litigant’s motion for new trial
• “[S]ave for extraordinary situations, we adhere to the crucial assumption that jurors carefully follow instructions.” (cleaned up)
• “ [ T]he existence of a tacit or mutual 9 USCA4 Appeal: 22-4128 Doc: 91 Filed: 01/03/2024 Pg: 10 of 23 understanding between conspirators is sufficient evidence of a conspiratorial agreement.” (quotation marks removed)
• “ [ T]he existence of a tacit or mutual 9 USCA4 Appeal: 22-4129 Doc: 90 Filed: 01/03/2024 Pg: 10 of 23 understanding between conspirators is sufficient evidence of a conspiratorial agreement.” (quotation marks removed)
• “[I]f the prosecution is to prove that a defendant acted as an ‘agent of a foreign government,’ it may need to rely on circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences to make its case—as it is entitled to do.”
• stating elements of § 371 conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).