In re H. A. Moore Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that visual art, and the street marketing of that art, were entitled to full First Amendment protection
• holding that total ban on sidewalk art does not leave open alternative means of communication because alternative display in galleries or museums would not reach the same audience.
• holding that total ban on sidewalk art does not leave open alternative means of communication because alternative display in galleries or museums would not reach the same audience
• holding that total ban on sidewalk art does not leave open alternative means of communication because alternative display in galleries or museums would not reach the same audience
• holding that a total ban on sidewalk art does not leave open alternative means of communication because alternative display in galleries or museums would not reach the same audience
• holding that total ban on sidewalk art does - 11 - not leave open alternative means of communication because alternative display in galleries or museums would not reach the same audience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).