In Re Gustavo Sanchez Martinez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that school board strategically built new schools in areas that would promote an increase in the desegregation of the district’s schools because the areas were conducive to “black student mobility” and “naturally integrated housing patterns”
• noting with approval that the school district, “while not contractually obligated to,” capped white enrollment at magnet schools to promote integration
• commending a school board for its use of magnet programs to encourage desegregation
• commending a school board for its use of magnet programs to encourage desegregation
• footnotes and internal citations to Green, Freeman, and other Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit opinions omitted
• “Since the Board operated de jure segregated schools in the past, there is a presumption that any current racial disparities in these areas are the result of its past unlawful conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).