In Re Guikema

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, however, that the debtors’ annuity in that case was not reasonable for their support, because of the debtors’ ability to reduce housing expenses, which would enable them to save for retirement, no evidence of health problems or other special needs
• applying the Hamo factors to a claimed exemption in a retirement annuity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).