In Re Guardianship of JO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \vague and casual reference to Indian ancestry\ did not trigger the notice requirements, particularly in light of the parties' failure to provide the court with any information suggesting Indian ancestry after being afforded the opportunity to do so
• finding that vague and casual references to Indian ancestry made by respondent mother's counsel were insufficient to trigger the Act's notice requirement
• holding that “vague and casual reference to Indian ancestiy” did not trigger the notice requirements, particularly in light of the parties’ failure to provide the court with any information suggesting Indian ancestry after being afforded the opportunity to do so
• finding that vague and casual references to Indian ancestry made by respondent mother’s counsel were insufficient to trigger the Act’s notice requirement
• affidavit would suffice to trigger notice if \amorphous\ statement by counsel is the only indication of Indian heritage
• affidavit would suffice to trigger notice if “amorphous” statement by counsel is the only indication of Indian heritage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).