In re Guardianship of Foust

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5833

Syllabus

GUARDIANSHIP — R.C. 2111.121(B) — APPOINTMENT — R.C. 2111.02(D)(2) — NOMINATION — BEST INTERESTS — STANDING: The probate court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's application for guardianship because the court's decision was supported by competent and credible evidence. Appellant lacked standing to challenge the court's appointment of two separate guardians, because the court's decision to appoint separate guardians did not prejudice appellant.