Skip to main content
· 7/30/2019

In re Guardianship of A.R.R.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3066

Syllabus

The probate court did not err when it adopted the magistrate's factual findings in ruling on appellant's objections because appellant failed to timely file a transcript of the proceedings before the magistrate in support of her objections. Because appellant did not comply with Civ.R. 53 by timely filing a transcript with the probate court, court of appeals was precluded from considering the untimely filed transcript in ruling on appellant's assignments of error. Probate court did not abuse its discretion in removing appellant as guardian and appointing the Franklin County Guardian Services Board as guardian of appellant's son where the facts found by the magistrate and adopted by the probate court supported the probate court's conclusion that appellant did not act in her son's best interests when she refused to accept the diagnosis of schizophrenia, was non-compliant with prescribed anti-psychotic medications, and refused to consent to medically necessary treatments. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Sadler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.