In re: G.T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that juvenile's exposure to controlled substances, and respondent-mother's erratic behavior, evidence of involuntary commitment, and disregard for a domestic violence restraining order exposed him to a substantial risk of impairment
• excluding testimony by psychologist expert “who had not worked with the juvenile and who lacked experience in juvenile court matters” because it “was not helpful to” the trial judge as “trier of fact”
• excluding testimony by psychologist expert “who had not worked with the juvenile and who lacked experience in juvenile court matters” because it “was not helpful to” the trial judge as “trier of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: J.M. & J.M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-09-19· cited 18×
• In re: L.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-04-18· cited 14×
• In re G.T.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-12-22
• In re B.N.M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-05-02
• In re J.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-12-05
• In re: A.M.C. & A.D.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-08-16
• In re: A.D.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-08-16
• In re: M.T. & K.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-09-06
• In re: N.R.R.N.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-02-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In re A.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-06-03· cited 30×