In Re Grischkan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the debtor’s “abuse of the bankruptcy process” and “egregious treatment of the lender” by, among other things, filing four bankruptcy cases in three years, warranted the imposition of an 180-day bar to refiling
• noting that section 349(a) provides a court with authority to sanction a debtor for cause by imposing a bar against re-filing
• barring repeat debtor from refiling a case for 180 days based on debt- or’s repeated failure to fund plans while the cases were pending

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).