Skip to main content

In Re Gray

Citations

  • 179 Cal. App. 4th 1189
  • 102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 551
  • 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se petitioner did not lack diligence where petitioner sought to effect his right to appellate review by incorrect means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scotland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.