In Re Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a party waived his privilege by asserting in a postconviction proceeding that his counsel was incompetent
• no privilege as to matters put in issue in habeas corpus proceeding where competency of counsel is at issue
• no privilege as to matters put in issue in habeas corpus proceeding where competency of counsel is at issue
• stating there is no attorney-client privilege in habeas corpus proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Scott
  California Supreme Court· 2003-01-27· cited 94×
• Rodriguez v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-10-17· cited 58×
• People v. Dennis
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-02-21· cited 54×
• State v. Walen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 51×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-09· cited 45×
• State v. Montgomery
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-26· cited 44×
• Durdines v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-11-16· cited 12×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Pope
  California Supreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 966×
• People v. Morris
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-10-19· cited 19×