In Re Graphic Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because debtor offered no evidence of its postreorganization value, court was un able to compare new capital contribution to value of interest received in exchange
• no “new value” exists where “there is no reason why Mr. King, as principal and controlling shareholder, could not recoup any contribution made whenever he so chooses”
• separately classifying trade creditors from competitor creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).