In Re Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing a Review Panel reprimand when attorney’s poor supervision permitted paralegal to steal client funds and attorney mismanaged other client funds
• imposing a Review Panel reprimand when attorney’s poor supervision permitted paralegal to steal client funds and attorney mismanaged other client funds
• Review Panel reprimand for misconduct related to mishandling of real estate closing and title insurance policies, and improper supervision of paralegal who stole client funds
• Review Panel reprimand for misconduct related to mishandling of 7 real estate closing and title insurance policies, and improper supervision of paralegal who stole client funds
• Review Panel5 reprimand for violations of Rules 5.3 and 1.15 (I) and (II) caused by Grant’s negligent failure to supervise her paralegal and to reconcile or review her IOLTA account
• “Grant offers in mitigation . . . that she has no prior disciplinary record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Edward Shuff Cook
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-04-05· cited 31×
• In the Matter of Christopher John Palazzola
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-12-21· cited 6×
• In re Braziel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 3×
• In the Matter of Cheryl Joyce Braziel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 3×
• In the Matter of Karen Lynn Pass
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-10-04· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Watkins v. ANEGUNDI
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-29· cited 1×