Skip to main content
· 8/4/1986

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Corporate Grand Jury Witness and \John Doe\ v. United States

Citations

  • 798 F.2d 32
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 616
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the district court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing on motion to intervene where submission was “patent[ly] insufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Mahoney, Lasker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.