Skip to main content
· 9/27/1989

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. John Doe

Citations

  • 886 F.2d 135
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14451
  • 1989 WL 110812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for determination of whether meetings were confidential in light of Michigan Open Meetings Act
  • “city council” was a “client” for the purpose of attorney-client privilege when a federal grand jury sought documents from the City of Detroit and the city asserted the privilege
  • implicitly finding that attorney for Detroit City Council could assert privilege
  • implicitly finding that attorney for Detroit City Council could assert privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Norris, McQuade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.