In Re Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America, Hana Koecher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing the rationales underlying the marital communications privilege and the adverse spousal testimonial privilege, acknowledging joint-participant exception to the former, and declining to recognize it for the latter
• “[R]ehabilitation ha[s] never been regarded as one of the interests served by the spousal privilege.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court’s action in Trammel has some negative implications as regards the joint participant excep- tion.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court’s action in Trammel has some negative implications as regards the joint participant excep- tion.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court’s action in Trammel has some negative implications as regards the joint participant excep- tion.”
• “[R]ehabilitation ha[s] never been regarded as one of the interests served by the spousal privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).