In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “Special Counsel’s recommendations as to precisely which redacted material we can release” as “too narrow”
• releasing “grand jury matters revealed either during the [resulting] trial or by grand jury witnesses themselves”
• releasing grand jury material because it had become widely known, thereby losing its character as Rule 6(e) information
• rejecting “Special Counsel’s recommendations as to precisely which redacted material we can release” as “too narrow”
• “[W]hen once- secret grand jury material becomes ‘sufficiently widely known,’ it may ‘los[e] its character as Rule 6(e) material.’” (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994))
• “[G]rand jury secrecy is not unyielding when there is no secrecy left to protect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).