· 4/5/1989
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. United States
Citations
- 868 F.2d 1014
- 1989 WL 17013
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument that “the government had the burden of proving at the contempt hearing that the company had access to the [documents] when it received the subpoena”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heaney, Fagg, Wollman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.