Skip to main content
· 4/5/1989

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. United States

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 1014
  • 1989 WL 17013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s argument that “the government had the burden of proving at the contempt hearing that the company had access to the [documents] when it received the subpoena”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Fagg, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.