Skip to main content
· 5/10/1978

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Rabbinical Seminary Netzach Israel Ramailis

Citations

  • 450 F. Supp. 1078
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a grand jury subpoena requesting, among other things, “Cash disbursement journals or other records or workpapers reflecting disbursements”
  • material requested by a grand jury subpoena is “relevant” if it “may have some possible connection to the subject matter of the investigation”
  • the court upheld the instant subpoenas’ validity as being reasonable, in part because their relevant time period of seven years was not “impermissi-bly extensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nickerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.