In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if counsel is called as witness concerning fee arrangement, “court could order a limited disqualification and allow [counsel] to continue to assist with ... defense, but not appear at counsel table in front of the jury”
• the information was not privileged or involved in defense strategy, would not take away too much time from defense preparations, nor would the threat of forfeiture discourage defense counsel because the canons of professional responsibility require zealous preparation
• the information was not privileged or involved in defense strategy, would not take away too much time from defense preparations, nor would the threat of forfeiture discourage defense counsel because the canons of professional responsibility require zealous preparation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).