In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 91-02922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the appellant had challenged both the contempt order and the “propriety of the $7000.00 fine,” but finding no abuse of discretion by the lower court
• “In re Grand Jury Subpoena”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).