In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Appeal of United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a district court faced with privilege objections should consider the material “on a document-by-document ba sis” to determine whether. each is privileged
• holding “an attorney seeking to quash a subpoena must assert the attorney-client privilege on a document-by-document basis” and reversing district court order quashing grand jury subpoena
• recognizing general requirement that subpoenaed taxpayer “must present himself with his records for questioning, and as to each question and each record elect to raise or not raise the defense [of self-incrimination]”
• holding so under circumstances similar to the present ones
• “[A]n attorney seeking to quash a subpoena must assert the attorney-client privilege on a document-by-document basis.”
• The lawyer “must present himself . . . for questioning, and as to each question . . . elect to raise or not to raise the defense.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).