Skip to main content
· 12/17/1996

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Unemancipated Minor Child

Citations

  • 949 F. Supp. 1487
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 94
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20571
  • 1996 WL 739256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As with spousal relationships, reason and experience dictate that parents and children share a unique relationship.”
  • “As with spousal relationships, reason and experience dictate that parents and children share a unique relationship.”
  • parent-child testimonial privilege did not apply because minor child did not “show[] how, or to what extent, his testimony would require revelation of actions or communications that would be adverse to his father’s interests”
  • parent-child testimonial privilege did not apply because minor child did not “show[ ] how, or to what extent, his testimony would require revelation of actions or communications that would be adverse to his father’s interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whaley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.