In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. John Doe, M.D. And Steve Roe, Witnesses-Appellants v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that government investigation into illegal dispensation of anabolic steroids, because it was valid exercise of commerce power, did not violate Tenth Amendment
• concluding that government investigation into illegal 4 dispensation of anabolic steroids, because it was valid exercise of commerce power, did not violate Tenth Amendment
• concluding without analysis that \it is evident that Doe customarily maintained the documents in his possession\
• concluding without analysis that “it is evident that Doe customarily maintained the documents in his possession”
• finding that confidential patient records have \public aspects\ for purposes of the Required Records Doctrine and that \expectations of privacy do not negate a finding that there is a public aspect to the files under the . . . regulatory schemes\
• finding that confidential patient records have “public aspects” for purposes of the Required Records Doctrine and that “expectations of privacy do not negate a finding that there is a public aspect to the files under the ... regulatory schemes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).