In Re Grand Jury Proceedings David R. Damore. Appeal of Robert Twist, Sr., Intervenor-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner for a stay pending appeal “must show” the four factors of a likelihood of success on the merits
• holding that a government subpoena asking an attorney to produce documents that would reflect date, place, and time of meetings with the client is not covered by the attorney-client privilege
• explaining that the Eleventh Circuit is bound by the Fifth Circuit’s holding that attorneys are third-parties under Perlman
• noting that privilege will not apply when actions are in furtherance of a crime or “other evil enterprise in concert with the attorney”
• allowing subpoena for “records of dates, places or times of meetings and communications”
• approving subpoena that sought “records of dates, places, or times of meetings and communications [between attorney and client], not the content of. those communications” because the materials sought were not “within the scope of the attorney-client privilege”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).