In re Grand Jury Proceeding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the manipulation alleged “increased and decreased prices at different times”
• “A claim for conspiracy to monopolize under section 2 requires a showing of . . . proof of a concerted action deliberately entered into with the specific intent to achieve an unlawful monopoly[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).